|
|
| BCP Partners |
|
Required by the 10(a) permit issued to the City of Austin and Travis County is the establishment of the
BCP system that conserves at least 30,428 acres of habitat. The strategy in assembling the BCP is to acquire
land in five major and two minor macrosites-Barton Creek Macrosite, Bull Creek Macrosite, Cypress Creek Macrosite,
North Lake Austin Macrosite, Pedernales Macrosite, South Lake Austin Macrosite, West Austin Macrosite-by 2016
if not sooner. Ownership of BCP land is broken out below in two ways - by Macrosite and by holdings of the
five major and private partners.
Currently, 27,906 acres of land has been designated as part of the BCP, representing 91.7% of the goal.
|
By Macrosite: |
Barton Creek Macrosite | 5,993 acres |
Bull Creek Macrosite | 4,746 acres |
Cypress Creek Macrosite | 7,803 acres
|
North Lake Austin Macrosite | 4,563 acres
|
Pedernales Macrosite | 259 acres
|
South Lake Austin Macrosite | 4,030 acres
|
West Austin Macrosite
| 462 acres |
By Partner:
|
|
City of Austin | 13,251 acres
|
|
Travis County
| 4,274 acres
|
The Nature Conservancy of Texas | 4,244 acres
|
|
Lower Colorado River Authority
| 2,707 acres
|
Travis Audubon Society | 680 acres
|
|
Private BCP Partners
| 2,750 acres |
|
Initially, those developing the BCCP wanted to set aside as much as 100,000 acres in Travis County for the BCP
system. Ensuing discussions and public input regarding property rights, economic development, and land management
reduced this number several times to arrive at the goal of 30,428 acres. While this represents to some too little
land conserved and to others too much, it is important to note that the BCCP estimated "land development during the
30-year term of the permit will reduce habitat for the listed species as follows: approximately half of known
occupied black-capped vireo habitat; 71% of potential golden-cheeked warbler habitat; and 84% of potential karst
invertebrate habitat." To better illustrate, this means that under the BCCP, 71% of potential golden-cheeked
warbler habitat in Travis County may be developed while only 29% of it is conserved.
|
|
|