|
In addition to the regional Section 10(a) permit, the City of Austin's authority and directive to
manage the Balcones Canyonlands Preserve (BCP) include access and permitted activities, is derived from the following:
The language of the 1992 bond ballot (see paragraph below) by which voters approved the purchase of land to become an endangered species preserve
The Habitat Conservation Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement accompanying the 10(a) permit application
The publicly approved Land Management Plans for the BCP
Additional guidelines are provided by the BCCP Scientific Advisory Committee Recommendations Regarding Recreational Use of
BCCP non-Grandfathered Preserves, November 1998.
Click here
to view a policy statement approved on November 28, 2007
When the City began evaluating and purchasing lands for the BCP, it was recognized that portions of some of
the City's parks contained habitat for the species protected under the BCCP. These areas of habitat were dedicated to the BCP,
but are "grandfathered" meaning they retain some of their earlier rules for recreational access. These unique components of the
BCP system have their management shared between the BCP program within the Austin Water Utility and the City's Parks and Recreation
Department and are referred to as "dual-management lands".
In these areas, unguided access is often allowed though visitors are asked to take special care to minimize noise and
disturbance at specific times of year and are required to stay on the trails provided so new impacts to habitat are not created.
Ballot Language for Proposition No. 10 on the August 1992 Bond Election Ballot:
"Shall the City Council of the City of Austin, Texas, the authorized to issue and sell general obligation bonds of said
city in the aggregate principal amount of $22,000,000, for the public purpose of paying costs incurred and to be incurred
in the acquisition and improvement of land to protect water quality, conserve endangered species, including, but not
limited to, the Tooth Cave Ground Beetle, the Tooth Cave Spider, the Kretschmarr Cave Mold Beetle, the Tooth Cave
Pseudoscorpion, the Bee Creek Cave Harvestman, the Black-capped Vireo, and the Golden-cheeked Warbler, and providing
open space for passive public use and other costs of implementing the Balcones Canyonlands Conservation Plan when approved
by the participating governmental entities; with said bonds to be issued in one or more series or issues, to mature serially
or otherwise and bear interest at such rate or rates, not to exceed the respective limits prescribe by law at the time or
issuance, and to be sold at such price or prices, as the City Council in its discretion shall determine; and shall there be
levied and pledged, assessed and collected annually ad valorem taxes on all taxable property in said city in an amount
sufficient to pay the annual interest on said bonds and provide a sinking fund to pay said bonds at maturity?"
Excerpt from the Habitat Conservation Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement, March 1996
Page 2-31, e. Land Management Plans and Guidelines
"The BCCP preserve system is to be managed to permanently conserve and facilitate the recovery of the populations of
target endangered species inhabiting western Travis County. This priority objective will govern preserve management
activities to improve target species habitat, while protecting preserves against degradation caused by urbanization
of surrounding lands and increased public demand for recreation usage within preserves.
The welfare of target species (species of concern) will be the overriding influence on all decisions
regarding activities on preserve lands. Decisions about activities within preserves should be made cautiously, so as to
meet biological objectives to protect and enhance target species and minimize risk of damage to their habitat."
Page 2-36, Public Access
"The preserve system may offer public access and recreational opportunities within the Austin and Travis County area
where possible and manageable. Public access may be allowed where and when such access does not threaten the welfare
of the target species of concern, which is the overriding goal of the preserve system, nor cause the degradation of
soil, vegetation, or water resources."
Page 2-33, Public Access
"A multiple-use management approach may be appropriate on some tracts, whereby other uses may be compatible with the
primary habitat protection and species management goals, as long as these uses either benefit or have no negative effects
on the species of concern and do not significantly compete with other management efforts for personnel or financial resources."
|