|
Shaded fuel breaks are based on the principle that closed canopy woodlands limit the fire potential
through most of the year. The dense canopy shades the ground and does not allow for the growth of
the fine fuels (grass etc.) that are the primary carrier of wildland fires. The higher humidity,
lower temperature, and reduced wind velocity under the canopy also moderate the fire potential.
If the canopy is disturbed these advantages are lost and the system becomes less stable and
ultimately more susceptible to fire.
In Central Texas, maintaining a closed canopy is sometimes desirable for aesthetic and/or
environmental reasons. Many of the woodlands already have the closed canopy and limited
ground fuels that moderate the fire potential, but the removal of dead woody material, lower
limbs, and selected trees can further improve the protection that they provide. Hardwoods
are generally less volatile than Ashe juniper so promoting the growth of native hardwoods,
especially red oak, can also reduce the fire potential. This can be accomplished by actively
planting new hardwoods and caging existing plants to protect them from deer browse. The
maintenance of closed canopy woodlands is minimal and easily accomplished. It is important
to plan fuel management treatments in woodlands carefully to ensure forest health requirements
are maintained and a technical specialist should be contacted to develop the appropriate
treatment specifications.
Creating a traditional fire break by converting oak-juniper woodlands into grasslands or savannas
has distinct disadvantages in Central Texas. Traditional fuel breaks are generally ineffective
because they are difficult to maintain and without proper maintenance they can not be defended
by fire department resources. In addition, a wildland fire can produce embers that can travel
100 feet or more and, to be effective, a fuel break would have to be wider then the potential
distance an ember could travel. This distance is generally cost prohibitive and would cause
significant impacts to the woodland ecosystem. The removal of the canopy promotes the growth
of grass which carries fire with rapid rates of spread and is combustible through much of the
year. Maintenance is difficult on the rocky soils and, without regular maintenance, the vegetation
will gradually convert back to shrubs and/or juniper dominated woodlands which are generally more
receptive to fire than the original closed canopy woodlands.
When conducting any fuel management projects it is important to plan for the removal of the vegetation
that is cut. In order for any fuel break to be effective the fuel must be removed from the site or
converted to a less volatile form. Generally, dead vegetation is more receptive to ignition than
live material and must be removed from the site to effectively mitigate the fire potential.
Maintaining a closed canopy woodland as a fuel break limits the amount of live material that is
converted to dead fuels and greatly reduces the amount of material that must be removed. When
removing dead material from a woodland the focus should be on smaller diameter branch wood and
twigs (less than 1 inch in diameter). Larger fuels can generally be left on-site because they
do not contribute greatly to fire behavior and are important components for forest health. Chipping
is often used to reduce the volume of the fuels but leaving the wood chips on the ground is not
recommended for ecological reasons. If chipping is determined to be the best option, the material
should be removed, chipped into piles, or dispersed so that the material is less than 3 inches in depth.
In areas where traditional firelines may be ineffective due to fuel characteristics or other criteria,
closed canopy woodlands may provide an alternative for homeowners and natural resource agencies. They
provide a mechanism to maintain important community values such as aesthetics and endangered species
habitat while improving fire safety for both the community and the wildlands.
|